Brassica napus with early maturity (Early Napus) and resistance to an AHAS-inhibitor herbicide

ABSTRACT

Improved varieties of  Brassica napus  having early maturity (“Early  Napus ”) and resistance to an AHAS-inhibitor herbicide, such as an imidazolinone, are provided. These varieties may be used to produce inbreds or hybrids or to produce vegetable oil and meal. Parts of these plants, including plant cells, are also provided.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 09/994,092 whichclaims priority under 35 USC 119(a) to Canadian Application No.2,326,283 filed Nov. 17, 2000.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention is in the field of canola breeding. In particular, itrelates to improved varieties of canola (Brassica napus) having earlymaturity (“Early Napus”), in combination with resistance to at least oneAHAS-inhibitor herbicide.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Canola is an important agricultural crop in Canada, the United States,Europe and Australia. Weed competition and earliness of maturity aresignificant limiting factors in canola crop production and quality. Thechallenge for plant scientists has been to develop canola varietieshaving superior performance with respect to these limiting factors,while at the same time having satisfactory agronomic characteristics,including yield potential, lodging resistance, oil and protein content,and glucosinolate levels that are sufficiently low for registration.

Resistance to AHAS-Inhibitor Herbicides

Herbicide resistant plants are plants that are able to survive andreproduce following exposure to herbicides at rates of application thatwould prevent non-herbicide resistant varieties of the same species fromsurviving and reproducing. Herbicide resistance is particularlyimportant for Brassica, since many weeds, such as stinkweed, shepherd'spurse, flixweed, ball mustard, wormseed mustard, hare's ear mustard andcommon peppergrass have a close genetic relationship with Brassica.Therefore, it is advantageous for a cultivar to have herbicideresistance not possessed by related weeds.

Some herbicides function by disrupting amino acid biosynthesis inaffected species. For example, AHAS-inhibitor herbicides (also known asALS-inhibitor herbicides) function by inhibiting the enzyme acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS), the first enzyme in the biosynthesis of the aminoacids, isoleucine, leucine and valine. In plants with resistance to anAHAS-inhibitor herbicide, inhibition of the AHAS enzyme is prevented,thus allowing the plant to continue with normal amino acid biosynthesis.Most forms of Brassica are highly susceptible to AHAS-inhibitorherbicides, such as imidazolinones and sulfonylureas.

The development of canola with resistance to imidazolinones, such asPURSUIT™ and ODYSSEY™, was a major breakthrough in weed managementtechnology. The imidazolinones are a family of broad spectrum herbicideswhich may be applied for in-crop weed control. They control a largernumber of problem species than herbicides used in non-herbicideresistant varieties, and offer greater management flexibility, includingtiming of application and tank mixing. An advantage of imidazolinone(“IMI”) resistant varieties over many other herbicide resistantvarieties, such as ROUNDUP READY™ (glyphosate) or LIBERTY LINK™(glufosinate) resistant varieties, is that some imidazolinone herbicideshave a soil residual which controls successive weed flushes. Thisprovides a significant advantage to farmers, because it enables them toachieve longer term weed control without a second application ofherbicide. Effective weed control increases yield by reducingcompetition from weed species. It also improves grain quality throughthe elimination of cruciferous weed seeds. It may also improve weedmanagement in other crops in the rotation, due to reduced weed pressure.

However, a drawback of currently available IMI resistant varieties isthat they lack many of the desirable traits found in elite varieties ofnon-herbicide resistant canola. In particular, none of the currentlyavailable canola varieties have the desirable combination of IMIresistance and early maturity (Early Napus). It is particularlydifficult to develop varieties having IMI resistance, in combinationwith other desirable traits, because the inheritance of the IMIresistance trait is relatively complex. Unlike the ROUNDUP READY™ traitor LIBERTY LINK™ trait, which are controlled by single transgenes thatexhibit complete dominance, the IMI resistance trait is controlled bytwo unlinked gene pairs having partial dominance. Swanson et al., PlantCell Reports 7:83-87 (1989) reported the development of imidazolinoneherbicide tolerant Brassica napus mutants using microspore mutagenesis.During the process, five fertile double-haploid Brassica napus mutantplants were developed. One of the mutants was tolerant to between 5 and10 times the recommended field traits of an imidazolinone herbicide. Aninheritance study indicated that two semi-dominant unlinked genescombined to produce an F1 with greater tolerance than either of theparents.

Rutledge et al., Mol. Gen. Genet. 229:31-40 (1991) proposed a model forthe inheritance of the five AHAS genes in Brassica napus. AHAS2, AHAS3and AHAS4 appear to be associated with the ‘A’ (rapa) genome and AHAS1and AHAS5 are likely associated with the ‘C’ (oleracea) genome. AHAS1and AHAS3 are expressed at all growth stages (Ouellet et al., Plant J.2:321-330 1992) and mutant forms of AHAS1 and AHAS3 appear to be themost effective tolerance genes. AHAS2 was found to be active only inovules and seeds. AHAS4 was found to be defective due to interruptedsequences in the middle of the coding region (Rutledge et al., Mol. GenGenet. 229:3140 1991) and was not expressed in tissues examined byOuellet et al., Plant J. 2:321-330 (1992). The last gene AHAS5, may alsobe defective (Rutledge et al. Mol. Gen Genet. 229:3140,1991). Hattori etal. Can J. Bot: 70:1957-1963, (1992) determined that the DNA sequence ofthe coding regions for AHAS1 and AHAS3 were 98% identical. DNA sequencesof the 5′ and the 3′ ends were also closely related. Few similaritieswere observed between the sequence of the AHAS2 compared to the AHAS1 orAHAS3 genes.

There are two effective mutations for IMI resistance in commercialuse—an AHAS1 mutant (believed to be located on the C genome) and anAHAS3 mutant (believed to be located on the A genome). The AHAS3 mutantalso provides resistance to other AHAS-inhibitor herbicides, such assulfonylureas. The complexity of the inheritance of the IMI resistancetrait results in multiple phenotypes during segregating generations,which presents a significant hurdle to plant breeders. Accordingly,there is a need to develop an AHAS-inhibitor herbicide resistant canolavariety with improved performance characteristics.

Early Napus

Early maturity is an important trait in Brassica napus varieties,especially in market areas with a limited frost-free period. Late summerfrosts can damage the crop before it is fully mature, resulting inelevated green seed content of the grain (a grading criterion) andincreased chlorophyll in the oil (a quality problem). High green seedresults in losses to the producer, while elevated chlorophyll in the oilincreases processing costs, and results in a loss of value for food endusers. Early Napus is also important where early maturity reducesexposure to extreme heat and drought conditions during flowering andseed-filling.

To be classified as “Early Napus”, a variety must have an averagematurity which is at least four days earlier than the average maturityof the current WCC/RRC (Western Canadian Canola/Rapeseed RecommendingCommittee) check varieties (DEFENDER™, EXCEL™, and LEGACY™) over twoyears at 11 locations in the Short Season Zone of Western Canada. Noknown varieties of Brassica napus have the desirable combination ofEarly Napus and resistance to an AHAS-inhibitor herbicide, such as animidazolinone. Therefore, there is a need for a Brassica napus varietywhich combines the advantageous traits of early maturity (Early Napus)and resistance to AHAS-inhibitor herbicides.

Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide animproved variety of Brassica napus having early maturity (Early Napus)and resistance to at least one AHAS-inhibitor herbicide, such as animidazolinone. These and other objects of the invention will be apparentto those skilled in the art from the following description and claims.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This invention provides a Brassica napus plant which is Early Napus andresistant to at least one AHAS-inhibitor herbicide, such as animidazolinone (e.g. imazethapyr or imazamox) or a sulfonylurea [e.g.thifensulfuron methyl (REFINE™)]. In one embodiment, it relates tocanola variety NS3801.

This invention also relates to tissue cultures of regenerable cells fromthe plants described above, as well as to the use of the tissue culturesfor regenerating canola plants that are Early Napus and resistant to atleast one AHAS-inhibitor herbicide, such as an imidazolinone or asulfonylurea. It also relates to the plants produced therefrom.

This invention further relates to the parts of the Brassica napus plantsdescribed above, including their cells, pollen, ovules, roots, leaves,seeds, microspores and vegetative parts, whether mature or embryonic. Italso relates to the use of these plant parts for regenerating a canolaplant that is Early Napus and resistant to at least one AHAS-inhibitorherbicide, such as an imidazolinone or a sulfonylurea, and to the plantsregenerated therefrom.

This invention further relates to the use of the plants described abovefor breeding a Brassica line, through pedigree breeding, crossing,self-pollination, haploidy, single seed descent, modified single seeddescent, and backcrossing, or other suitable breeding methods, and tothe plants produced therefrom. This invention also relates to a methodfor producing a first generation (F1) hybrid canola seed by crossing oneof the plants described above with an inbred canola plant of a differentvariety or species, and harvesting the resultant first generation (F1)hybrid canola seed. It further relates to the plants produced from theF1 hybrid seed.

This invention also relates to the use of the Brassica napus plantsdescribed above for producing oil and/or meal, and to the vegetable oiland meal produced therefrom. Preferably, the plant is capable ofproducing oil with less than 2% erucic acid and meal with less than 30μmol of glucosinolates per gram of defatted meal.

This invention provides substantial value to both producers and users ofcanola by providing hitherto unavailable combinations of early maturity(Early Napus) and resistance to at least one AHAS-inhibitor herbicide.This trait combination improves weed control, while improving orstabilizing grain quality by reducing green seed count.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with this invention, improved varieties of Brassica napushaving early maturity (Early Napus) and resistance to at least oneAHAS-inhibitor herbicide are developed by crossing a parent withresistance to an AHAS-inhibitor herbicide with one or more parentshaving early maturity (Early Napus), wherein the herbicide resistantparent and the Early Napus parent(s) together have the genetic basis forthe complement of characteristics desired in the progeny.Self-pollination or sib-mating following crossing leads to a segregationof traits among the progeny. Progeny having the desired combination oftraits are selected after exposure to one or more appropriateAHAS-inhibitor herbicides and evaluation for desirable traits oversuccessive generations.

Various breeding methods may be used, including haploidy, pedigreebreeding, single-seed descent, modified single seed descent, recurrentselection, and backcrossing. Because of the complex inheritance of theAHAS-inhibitor herbicide resistant trait, we have found that haploidy isthe most effective breeding method. Parents having the desiredcomplement of characteristics are crossed in a simple or complex cross.Crossing (or cross-pollination) refers to the transfer of pollen fromone plant to a different plant. Progeny of the cross are grown andmicrospores (immature pollen grains) are separated and filtered, usingtechniques known to those skilled in the art [(e.g. Swanson, E. B. etal., Plant Cell Reports, “Efficient isolation of microspores and theproduction of microspore-derived embryos in Brassica napus”, 6:94-97(1987); and Swanson, E. B., Microspore Culture in Brassica, pp. 159-169in: Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 6, Plant Cell and Tissue Culture,Humana Press (1990)]. These microspores exhibit segregation of genes.The microspores are cultured in the presence of an appropriateAHAS-inhibitor herbicide, such as imazethapyr (e.g. PURSUIT™) orimazamox (e.g. RAPTOR™) or a 50/50 mix of imazethapyr and imazamox (e.g.ODYSSEY™), which kills microspores lacking the mutations responsible forresistance to the herbicide. Microspores carrying the mutant genesresponsible for resistance to the herbicide survive and produce embryos,which form haploid plants. Their chromosomes are then doubled to producedoubled haploids.

The doubled haploids are evaluated in subsequent generations forherbicide resistance, early maturity, and other desirable traits.AHAS-inhibitor herbicide resistance may be evaluated by exposing plantsto one or more appropriate AHAS-inhibitor herbicides and evaluatingherbicide injury. Earliness of maturity can be evaluated through visualinspection of seeds within pods (siliques) on the plants. Some othertraits, such as lodging resistance and plant height may also beevaluated through visual inspection of the plants. Blackleg resistancemay be evaluated by inoculating plants with blackleg spores to inducethe disease, and observing resistance to infection. Other traits, suchas oil percentage, protein percentage, and total glucosinolates of theseeds may be evaluated using techniques such as Near InfraredSpectroscopy.

It is also possible to analyze the genotype of the plants, usingtechniques such as Isozyme Electrophoresis, Restriction Fragment LengthPolymorphisms (RFLPs), Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs),Arbitrarily Primed Polymerase Chain Reaction (AP-PCR), DNA AmplificationFingerprinting (DAF), Sequence Characterized Amplified Regions (SCARs),Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLPs), and Simple SequenceRepeats (SSRs) which are also referred to as “Microsatellites”.

Evaluation and manipulation (through exposure to one or more appropriateAHAS-inhibitor herbicides, and blackleg infection) typically occurs overseveral generations. The performance of the new lines is evaluated usingobjective criteria in comparison to check varieties. Lines showing thedesired combination of traits are self-pollinated to produce seed.Self-pollination refers to the transfer of pollen from one flower to thesame flower or another flower of the same plant. Plants that have beenself-pollinated and selected for type for many generations becomehomozygous at almost all gene loci and produce a uniform population oftrue breeding progeny.

Other breeding methods may also be used. For example, pedigree breedingis commonly used for the improvement of largely self-pollinating cropssuch as canola. Pedigree breeding starts with the crossing of twogenotypes, each of which may have one or more desirable characteristicsthat is lacking in the other or which complements the other. If the twooriginal parents do not provide all of the desired characteristics,additional parents can be included in the crossing scheme.

These parents are crossed in a simple or complex manner to produce anF₁. An F₂ population is produced by selfing one or several F₁'s or byintercrossing two F₁'s (i.e., sib mating). Selection of the bestindividuals may begin in the F₂ population, and beginning in the F₃ thebest families, and the best individuals within the best families areselected. Replicated testing of families (lines) can begin in the F₄generation to improve the effectiveness of selection for traits with lowheritability. At an advanced stage of inbreeding (i.e., F₆ and F₇), thebest lines or mixtures of phenotypically similar lines commonly aretested for potential release as new cultivars.

The single seed descent (SSD) procedure may also be used to breedimproved varieties. The SSD procedure in the strict sense refers toplanting a segregating population, harvesting a sample of one seed perplant, and using the population of single seeds to plant the nextgeneration. When the population has been advanced from the F₂ to thedesired level of inbreeding, the plants from which lines are derivedwill each trace to different F₂ individuals. The number of plants in apopulation declines each generation due to failure of some seeds togerminate or some plants to produce at least one seed. As a result, notall of the plants originally sampled in the F₂ population will berepresented by a progeny when generation advance is completed.

In a multiple-seed procedure, canola breeders commonly harvest one ormore pods from each plant in a population and thresh them together toform a bulk. Part of the bulk is used to plant the next generation andpart is put in reserve. The procedure has been referred to as modifiedsingle-seed descent or the pod-bulk technique. The multiple-seedprocedure has been used to save labor at harvest. It is considerablyfaster to thresh pods with a machine than to remove one seed from eachby hand for the single-seed procedure. The multiple-seed procedure alsomakes it possible to plant the same number of seeds of a population eachgeneration of inbreeding. Enough seeds are harvested to make up forthose plants that did not germinate or produce seed.

Backcross breeding can be used to transfer a gene or genes for a simplyinherited, highly heritable trait from one line or cultivar (the donorparent) into another desirable cultivar or inbred line (the recurrentparent). After the initial cross, individuals possessing the phenotypeof the donor parent are selected and are repeatedly crossed(backcrossed) to the recurrent parent. When backcrossing is complete,the resulting plant is expected to have the attributes of the recurrentparent and the desirable trait transferred from the donor parent.

Improved varieties may also be developed through recurrent selection. Agenetically variable population of heterozygous individuals is eitheridentified or created by intercrossing several different parents. Thebest plants are selected based on individual superiority, outstandingprogeny, or excellent combining ability. The selected plants areintercrossed to produce a new population in which further cycles ofselection are continued.

Regeneration of Plants

This invention also relates to the parts of the plants disclosed herein,including plant cells, tissue, pollen, ovules, roots, leaves, seeds, andmicrospores, whether mature or embryonic.

The plants produced in accordance with the present invention may beregenerated from plant parts using known techniques. For instance, seedsfrom the plants of the present invention may be planted in accordancewith conventional Brassica growing procedures. These plants willgenerate further seeds following self-pollination. Alternatively,doubled haploid plantlets may be extracted to immediately formhomozygous plants, using known procedures.

Brassica plants may also be regenerated using tissue culture andregeneration. Tissue culture of various tissues of canola andregeneration of plants therefrom is known to those skilled in the art.For example, the propagation of a canola cultivar by tissue culture isdescribed in the following references: Chuong et al., “A Simple CultureMethod for Brassica Hypocotyl Protoplasts”, Plant Cell Reports 4:4-6(1985); Barsby, T. L. et al. “A Rapid and Efficient AlternativeProcedure for the Regeneration of Plants from Hypocotyls Protoplasts ofBrassica napus”, Plant Cell Reports, (Spring 1996); Kartha, K. et al.“In vitro Plant Formation from Stem Explants of Rape” Physiol. Plant,31:217-220 (1974); Narashimhulu, S. et al., “Species Specific ShootRegeneration Response of Cotyledenary Explants of Brassicas”, Plant CellReports, (Spring 1988); Swanson, E., “Microspore Culture in Brassica”,Methods of Molecular Biology, Vol. 6, Chapter 17, p. 159 (1990).

Use of Brassica as a Breeding Line

The Brassica napus plants of this invention may be used to breed a novelBrassica line. The combination of desired traits described herein, onceestablished, can be transferred into other Brassica napus plants byknown plant breeding techniques including self-pollination, crossing,recurrent selection, backcross breeding, pedigree breeding, single seeddescent, modified single seed descent, haploidy, and other suitablebreeding methods.

The desired traits can also be transferred between Brassica species,such as B. napus, B. rapa (formerly known as B. campestris), and B.juncea, using the same known plant breeding techniques involving pollentransfer and selection. The transfer of traits between Brassica species,such as napus and rapa by known plant breeding techniques is welldocumented in the technical literature (see for instance, Tsunada etal., 1980, Brassica Crops and Wild Alleles Biology and Breeding”, JapanScientific Press, Tokyo).

As an example of the transfer of the desired traits described hereinfrom napus to rapa, one selects a commercially available rapa varietysuch as REWARD™, GOLDRUSH™, and KLONDIKE™, and carries out aninterspecific cross with one of the plants from the present invention.After the interspecific cross, members of the F1 generation areself-pollinated to produce F₂ oilseed. Selection for the desired traitsis then conducted on single F₂ plants which are then backcrossed withthe rapa parent through the number of generations required to obtain aeuploid (n=10) rapa line exhibiting the desired combination of traits.

In order to avoid inbreeding depression (e.g. loss of vigour andfertility) that may accompany the inbreeding of Brassica rapa, selected,i.e. BC₁ plants that exhibit similar desired traits while under geneticcontrol advantageously can be sib-mated. The resulting oilseed fromthese crosses can be designated BC₁SIB₁ oilseed. Accordingly, thefixation of the desired alleles can be achieved in a manner analogous toself-pollination while simultaneously minimizing the fixation of otheralleles that potentially exhibit a negative influence on vigor andfertility.

This invention is also directed to methods for producing an F1 hybridseed by crossing a first parent Brassica napus plant with a secondparent Brassica plant, wherein the first parent plant is an inbredBrassica napus plant, such as canola variety NS3801, which is EarlyNapus and resistant to at least one AHAS-inhibitor herbicide. Thisinvention is also related to the plants produced from the F1 hybrid seedand the cells and other parts of those plants.

Alternatively, both first and second parent Brassica plants can comefrom the same varieties. Advantageously, one of the Brassica varietiesof the present invention is used in crosses with a different Brassicainbred to produce first generation (F₁) canola hybrid seeds and plantswith superior characteristics and increased vigour.

Preferably when generating hybrid plants, the parent should haveglucosinolate levels that are sufficiently low to ensure that the seedof the F₁ hybrid has glucosinolate levels within regulatory levels. Theglucosinolate level of the seed harvested from the F₁ hybrid is roughlythe average of the glucosinolate levels of the male and female parents.For example, if the objective is to obtain hybrid grain (F₂) having aglucosinolate level of less than 20 μmol/g, and one parent has aglucosinolate level of 15 μmol/g, the other parent must have aglucosinolate level of 25 μmol/g or less.

Vegetable Oil and Meal

The seed of the plants of this invention may be used for producingvegetable oil and meal. The seed of these varieties, the plant producedfrom such seed, the hybrid canola plant produced from the crossing ofthese varieties with other inbred varieties, the resulting hybrid seed,and various parts of the hybrid canola plant can be utilized in theproduction of an edible vegetable oil or other food products inaccordance with known techniques. The remaining solid meal componentderived from seeds can be used as a nutritious livestock feed. Canolavariety NS3801 can be used to produce oil of improved quality, due tolower chlorophyll levels in the oil. Preferably, the oil has less than2% erucic acid and the meal has less than 30 μmol of glucosinolates pergram of defatted meal.

A preferred embodiment of this invention is set forth below. It shouldbe understood, however, that the invention is not limited to thespecific details set forth in this example.

Development of the Improved IMI Resistant Brassica Napus Line, NS3801.

-   Generation: Parent to F1-   Seed Planted: BULLET™ and DEFENDER™, two spring canola varieties    developed by Svalof-Weibulls, and marketed commercially by Proven    Seed-   Seed Harvested: 94SN-9514=(BULLET™/DEFENDER™)-   Method: Parents were grown and crossing was carried out in a    controlled environment in the greenhouse.-   Generation: Single cross F1 to three-way cross F1-   Seed Planted: 94SN-9514=(BULLET™×DEFENDER™) and 45A71 (Breeder code    NS1471, registered imidazolinone resistant spring canola variety    from Pioneer Hi-Bred, commercially available from Proven Seed)-   Seed Harvested: 96SN-0564=(45A71×(BULLET™×DEFENDER™)-   Method: Parents were grown and crossing was carried out in a    controlled environment in the greenhouse. 45A71 was used as the    female parent. Approximately six female plants and more than 10 male    plants were sampled in making the three-way cross. IMI resistance    was contributed by 45A71, which is homozygous for the imidazolinone    resistant genes.-   Generation: Three way Cross F1 to doubled haploid (F-infinity)-   Seed Planted: 96SN-0564=(45A71×(BULLET™×DEFENDER™))-   Seed Harvested: 97DHS-6259-   Method: Twelve plants of 96SN-0564 were planted in the growth room    under controlled environment as donor plants. These plants were    sprayed with the herbicide, PURSUIT™ (imazethapyr), at 1×level.    Immature buds were harvested from each donor plant and were crushed    in a blender to produce a slurry [as described in Swanson, E. B. et    al., “Efficient isolation of microspores and the production of    microspore-derived embryos in Brassica napus” L. Plant Cell Reports    6: 94-97 (1987); and Swanson, E. B. Microspore culture in Brassica,    pgs. 159-169 in: Methods in Molecular Biology vol. 6, Plant Cell and    Tissue Culture, Humana Press (1990)]. The slurry was then filtered    through two layers of Nitex filters (48 μm pores) and collected in    centrifuge tubes. The suspensions were centrifuged, decanted and    washed three times for a total of 4 spins. Microspores were counted    using a haemocytometer and plated in NLN medium [Lichter, R.,    “Induction of haploid plants from isolated pollen of Brassica    napus, Z. Pflanzenphysiol. Bd. 105: 427-434, (1982)], containing 40    μg/l PURSUIT™, at a density of 60,000 microspores per ml. Ten ml of    this suspension were poured into 100×25 mm petri plates wrapped with    parafilm, and placed in a Percival incubation chamber at 32.5° C. in    darkness for 15 days. During this period the microspores carrying    imidazolinone-resistant genes were expected to survive and produce    embryos. After 15 days, petri plates with cotyledonary embryos were    put in a rotary shaker for 6 to 13 days before being transferred to    a solid 0.8% agar medium with 0.1% Gibberillic acid (GA) in petri    plates. Transferred embryos were incubated in the dark at 4-8° C.    for 7-10 days and removed to a Percival incubation chamber in light    at 20 to 25° C. for 3 to 5 weeks. Selected embryos that regenerated    were placed in soil in 72 cell flats or put back onto 0.8% agar with    0.1% GA for a further 3 to 5 weeks before they were transplanted    into the soil. Before flowering, plants were treated with 0.33%    colchicine for 1.5 to 2.5 hours. Plant roots were washed free of    soil prior to incubation in the colchicine solution. After treatment    they were planted in 10 cm plastic pots. Upon flowering, plants with    fertile (diploid) racemes were covered with perforated, clear    plastic bags to produce selfed seeds. After flowering, bags were    removed and plants were dried down, seed was harvested, cleaned and    cataloged with a DHS number. Lines with 100 seeds or more were    prepared for nursery evaluation.-   Generation: Doubled haploid evaluation-   Seed Planted: 97DHS-6259 along with the check varieties 46A72    (NS1472), 45A71 (NS1471) and 46A74 (NS2211)-   Seed Harvested: In order to perform quality analysis, twenty grams    of open pollinated seed was harvested from 97DHS-6259. An equal    amount of seed was harvested from the check rows. After completing    the evaluation and finalizing selections, seed was harvested from    the entire row for each selected line including 97DHS-6259.-   Method: Several hundred imidazolinone resistant spring canola    doubled haploid lines, including 97DHS-6259, were planted in the    breeding nursery (project X823A) for evaluation purpose. Each line    was planted in a three meter long row with approximately 100    seeds/row. 46A72 was planted in every 20^(th) row (#1, 20, 40, 60    etc.) for use as a quality check. 45A71 and 46A74, commercial    imidazolinone resistant varieties from Pioneer Hi-Bred, were planted    as checks in rows, 10, 50, 90 and 30, 70 110 of each range. The    entire nursery was sprayed with ODYSSEY™(a 50/50 mix of imazethapyr    and imazamox) at 30g/ha when plants were at the 4-leaf stage. A    second application of ODYSSEY™ (30g/h) was made when plants were in    the rosette stage. Doubled haploid lines showing herbicide injury    were noted. Observations recorded included: days to flowering, days    to maturity, agronomic score at flowering and agronomic score at    maturity. At physiological maturity, lines to be harvested were    selected visually. A 20 g seed sample was harvested from each of the    selected lines. The quality check rows of 46A72 were also harvested.    The samples were analyzed in the lab and for oil percentage, protein    percentage, and total glucosinolates using NIR (Near Infrared    Spectroscopy). Final selection of lines was based on days to    maturity, agronomic score at maturity, oil percentage, protein    percentage and total glucosinolates. Several doubled haploid lines    were selected including 97DHS-6259.-   Generation: Greenhouse Pure seed increase-   Seed Planted: 97DHS-6259-   Seed Harvested: 97DHS-6259-   Method: Each selected line including 97DHS-6259, was planted in the    greenhouse (project SN-707) using remnant pure seed. All lines were    sprayed with 60 g/ha ODYSSEY™ (2×rate) at the 4-leaf stage, in order    to confirm imidazolinone resistance. All lines were inoculated with    blackleg (Phoma lingam) spores, to induce disease development. Lines    showing herbicide injury and/or susceptibility to blackleg were    discarded. Selected lines, including 97SN-6259 were self-pollinated    to produce 20g of seed, and were assigned new code numbers.    97SN-6259 was assigned the code, NS3801.-   Generation: Field Evaluation (R200 tests)-   Seed Planted: NS3801-   Seed Harvested: NS3801

Method: The selected lines including NS3801, were evaluated in a tworeplicate yield trial (R221) planted at six locations in western Canada.Plot size was 9 square meters (6 m×1.5 m). The seeding rate was 5.5kg/ha. Appropriate check varieties were included in the yield trial. Thesame entries were planted in a disease trail where blackleg inoculum wasapplied to ensure uniform disease infection. Observations recordedincluded: days to flowering, days to maturity, lodging score (1=poor,9=good), yield (q/ha), and moisture percentage. At harvest, a 15 gramseed sample was collected from each plot, and was analyzed to determineoil percentage, protein percentage, total glucosinolates, and fatty acidcomposition. TABLE 1 illustrates the performance of Brassica napusvariety NS3801 in comparison to WCC/RRC check varieties. Yield** YieldMaturity Oil Protein Glucs Blackleg VARIETY (Qu/Ha) (% Chk) (Days) (%)(%) (uM/g) (1-9)** NS3801 29.60 93.36 102.40 48.29 46.30 13.89 8.44Defender 29.67 93.80 105.70 48.16 48.14 13.63 6.57 Excel 33.93 107.27109.50 49.70 47.67 18.08 6.04 Legacy 31.34 99.08 108.40 49.64 48.7510.90 5.57 Mean of Napus Chks # 31.65 100.05 107.87 49.17 48.19 14.206.06 Difference −2.05 −6.69 −5.47 −0.88 −1.89 −0.31 2.38*Data from Pioneer Hi-Bred Trials in the Short Season Zone of WesternCanada**Trait Definitions: Yield = seed yield in quintals (decitonnes) perhectare and as percentage of Checks Mean; Maturity = days from Plantingto physiological maturity; Oil & Protein as percentage of total seedweight at 8.5% moisture; Glucs = aliphatic glucosinolates in seed at8.5% moisture, expressed in micromoles per gram# WCC/RRC Check Varieties for B. napus & B. rapa. For registration ofearly B. napus varieties, yield and composition are Compared to B. rapa,and maturity is compared to B. napus, where Early Napus = −4 days ormore vs. B. napus checks

Deposits

This invention is not to be construed as limited to the particularembodiments disclosed, since these are regarded as illustrative ratherthan restrictive. Moreover, variations and changes may be made by thoseskilled in the art without departing from the spirit of this invention.

The seeds of the subject invention were deposited in the American TypeCulture Collection (ATCC), 10801 University Blvd., Manassas, Va.20110-2209, USA: Seed Accession Number Deposit Date Brassica napusNS3801 PTA-2470 Sep. 14, 2000The deposit will be maintained at ATCC, P.O. Box 1549, Manassas, Va.201008. Access to this deposit will be available during the pendancy ofthe application to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks andpersons determined by the Commissioner to be entitled thereto uponrequest. This deposit will be maintained under the terms of the BudapestTreaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorganismsfor the Purposes of Patent Procedure. The deposit will irrevocably andwithout restriction or condition be available to the public uponissuance of a patent. However, it should be understood that theavailability of a deposit does not constitute a license to practice thesubject invention in derogation of patent rights granted by governmentaction or under the Plant Variety Protection Act (7 USC 2321 et seq.).

1. A Brassica napus progeny plant or plant part of variety NS3801,wherein the variety contains alleles fixed for Early Napus andresistance to at least one AHAS-inhibitor herbicide and wherein theprogeny plant or plant part also contains the fixed alleles and is EarlyNapus and resistant to at least one AHAS-inhibitor herbicide,representative seed of variety NS3801 having been deposited under ATCCAccession No. PTA-2470.
 2. A Brassica napus progeny plant seed ofvariety NS3801, wherein the variety contains alleles fixed for EarlyNapus and resistance to at least one AHAS-inhibitor herbicide andwherein the progeny plant seed also contains the fixed alleles and isEarly Napus and resistant to at least one AHAS-inhibitor herbicide,representative seed of variety NS3801 having been deposited under ATCCAccession No. PTA-2470.
 3. A Brassica napus progeny plant cell ofvariety NS3801, wherein the variety contains alleles fixed for EarlyNapus and resistance to at least one AHAS-inhibitor herbicide andwherein the progeny plant cell also contains the fixed alleles and isEarly Napus and resistant to at least one AHAS-inhibitor herbicide,representative seed of variety NS3801 having been deposited under ATCCAccession No. PTA-2470.
 4. A method for preparing oil and/or meal from aseed of Brassica napus variety NS3801, the method comprising crushingthe seed and separating the oil and/or seed, representative seed ofvariety NS3801 having been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-2470.5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the oil has less than 2%erucic acid.
 6. The method of claim 4, wherein the meal has aglucosinolate content of less than 30 μmol per gram of defatted meal.